Sponsored Content There’s been plenty of chatter concerning the International Monetary Fund (IMF). These “discussions” range from criticisms to dystopian warnings. No matter what degree of negativity you may have received from these messages, they point to a common “endgame”—a Bretton Woods 2.0, a concept introduced by IMF Director Kristalina Georgiev in her article, “A New Bretton Woods Moment.” Many of the criticisms come off as apocalyptic musings from the extreme end of economic perception. Yet, not all should be written off too hastily. Distinguishing the real from “fake” may be the most prudent move, especially if you care about your wealth. Noble Intentions Through Coercive Means? This constitutes the main allegation aimed at the IMF: humanist intentions achieved through coercive (read: anti-humanist) means. The biggest point of contention is that the IMF has only one solution to every problem: centralized planning and intervention. It doesn’t matter what the problem …