Commentary
Banking regulators, along with the board of directors and management of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), each failed to see or prevent the problems that destroyed in less than a week one of the largest banks in the country. The regulators, whose mandate is explicitly designed to prevent such a disaster, allowed SVB to grow too fast when effective controls were not in place. No chief risk officer was in place for eight months, until January 2023, at which point it was too late.
SVB’s total assets tripled in just two years, from $71 billion at the end of to 2019 to $211 billion at the end of 2021. While deposits also tripled, they were low-quality demand deposits that could be withdrawn immediately at the first whiff of trouble. The bank grew deposits too fast to find creditworthy customers to lend to, so instead the bank invested more than $100 billion of its liquidity in investment securities, which, when interest rates rose, resulted in billions of dollars of losses. Depositors got wind of the depth of the issues, and within hours, SVB exploded, casting shrapnel far and wide, and the entire U.S. banking sector was set afire….
-
Recent Posts
-
Archives
- May 2025
- April 2025
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- September 2013
- July 2013
- March 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- December 1
-
Meta