The advances in science and medicine since the 1973 Supreme Court ruling in Roe v. Wade show why justices should overturn it, Rep. Kat Cammack (R-Fla.) says. “Roe v. Wade came at a time when the science wasn’t reflective of the fact that life begins at conception. Today, we know that to be true. And we know that the child in the womb can feel pain. We have science on our side,” Cammack said during an interview with NTD’s “Capitol Report” over the weekend. [delete] In Roe v. Wade, justices ruled abortion is a constitutional right and barred states from curtailing abortion access before fetal viability. A followup ruling from the court in 1992 held states can’t impose significant restrictions on abortion before a fetus becomes viable for life outside the womb. In the years since, the age that unborn children can survive outside the womb has become younger—a 21-week-old baby …