Recently disclosed emails from Dr. Anthony Fauci reveal that a small group of scientists was acting in a coordinated effort to actively discredit the lab leak theory. A secret teleconference organized by Fauci and British pharmaceutical trust director Jeremy Farrar may have established the natural origins narrative that would be used throughout 2020. This was followed by a hastily organized meeting to advise the National Academies of Sciences. This meeting included Fauci, Peter Dazsak, and Kristian Andersen. It resulted in a formal statement to the White House that more data was needed to determine the virus’s origin. So why were these same experts circulating draft articles that stated exactly the opposite opinion? Why did these articles differ from their private communications? Why were so many signatories to these articles affiliated with Fauci, Daszak, and Farrar? Why did so many of the unaffiliated scientists later change their minds regarding the possibility …