While investigating the potential for variations in side effects from one batch of shots to another, these authors made a stunning discovery: 30 percent of the total doses given that year in this country had zero side effects—something that only happens when a placebo is used. Did the regulators know? STORY AT-A-GLANCE Since mRNA shots contain several novel technologies, they should be subject to more controls than conventional vaccines. Yet they aren’t. In fact, they’re not covered by any specific regulations.
mRNA COVID-19 shots are gene therapy, but not regulated as such. By slapping a fraudulent “vaccine” label on gene therapies, they are being developed outside of the regulatory framework that governs them.
An alternative framework that could regulate mRNA shots would be Type1A pro-drug regulations, but they’re not being regulated as such either.
Per the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) definition, gene therapy covers two modes of operation. It either alters the biological properties of living cells, and/or modifies your genes. This means that even if the product does not modify your genes, it’s still a gene therapy if it modifies the properties of cells, which is what the COVID-19 shots do.
Data show 1 in 3 Pfizer COVID-19 shots administered in Denmark were placebo—and regulators must have known about it. While the COVID-19 shots are referred to as “vaccines,” they do not meet the classical definition of a vaccine. Health authorities needed to change the definition1 to accommodate the COVID-19 shots and shut down the argument that, as experimental gene therapies, they may be riskier than traditional vaccines….