The federal court judge who rejected the four travel vaccine mandate lawsuits citing “mootness” last week has released her rationale for doing so a few days later on Oct. 27, saying there is “no important public interest” to justify hearing the cases.
“The Applicants have substantially received the remedies sought and as such, there is no live controversy to adjudicate,” Justice Jocelyne Gagné wrote in her decision, due to the mandates and other public health measures having been repealed.
“There is no important public interest or inconsistency in the law that would justify allocating significant judicial resources to hear these moot Applications.”…