Commentary
The World Health Organization (WHO) is seeking public input on the scope of a planned internationally binding pandemic agreement. Before proceeding, however, fundamental questions should be answered on the underlying justification for such an agreement, its potential benefits and harms, and the WHO’s competence for the guiding role. Rather than rushing to address the “next” pandemic, we suggest that the world requires a return to calm, rational thought, and a transparent discussion based upon the public health principles embedded within the WHO’s constitution (pdf).
The Example of COVID-19
The response to COVID-19 has exposed many flaws in the systems of global public health. Economies have been left struggling and inequality has increased, as the wealth of low- and middle-income earners is transferred to the wealthiest members of society. National debt has risen while GDP has fallen, cementing future poverty. The education of a generation of children has been severely disrupted, even though it was known from the beginning that they were at little risk from COVID-19 itself. Global food security is declining due to ongoing supply chain disruption, most notable in low-income counties. As is often the case, those with the least are suffering the most….